Brajesh Pandey | Commerce, Management, Economics & Commercial Laws

There has been a lots of debate  on the validity and impact of theory of Marks and lenin. Many blame manusmriti , might be there are many texts in manusmriti which indeed speaks against equality of women , which in modern context indeed doesn't resembles the truth. But there are many other scripture which endorces women genunity and the characters in the stories mentioned in vedic scriptures of women like gargi, vedomati (sita) who indeed performed exceptional spiritual endeavours in their life and achieved their Goal.                Socialism to much extent  means equality and that's what the vedic characters of many women signifies.                          Coming to the monetary aspests, Bhishm pitamah had adviced to yudhishthir about the promotion or entrepreneurship and other social welfare scheme with the main objective to bring prosperity in his kingdom. Prosperit...

We speak of democracy, it sounds very charming on the Screen in the news debate. But , de we really know what democracy actually means, We as a citizen are lucky to be born on the soil where Gods wish to take birth and they incarnate. But the question at present arise to fulfill our political goals and ambition, how long will we keep adopting undemocratic and pathetic means.            Our scriptures teaches world is a family, wasn't priyanka Reddy a human being, our sages living in the forest had deep love with animals and history is full of such examples, So were are we heading today under the shadow of democracy.              Priyanka Reddy was instigated to be raped by the conspirators  through youth who all are of age the around 20 years. We as a society today has to think of both the youth and the women. The conspirators  instigated the youth such act will spoil our youths and they will fall prey to evi...

एक संत नदी में स्नान कर रहे थे, और एक बिच्छु उन्हें बार बार आकर डंक मार रहा था, संत उस बिच्छू को हर बार हाथ से हटा देते , उनके शिष्यों ने पूछा बिच्छू को आप ने मार किउ नही दिया, संत ने उत्तर दिया जब बिच्छू ने अपनी प्रवित्ति नही बदली तो मैं किउ बदलू।               प्राकृति में सभी  प्राणी अपने मूल  प्रकृति  के अनुरूप ही कार्य करते है। गीता में भगवान कृष्ण कहते है, जब तक मनुष्य मेरी भक्ति नही करता तब तक वह प्राकृति के तीन गुणों द्वारा वशीभूत होकर उसके अनुरूप कार्य करता है।            अतः भक्ति ही एक मार्ग है जिससे हम अपने गुण और स्वभाव में बदलाव ला सकते है।

Reading at yesterday's arguments of Meenakshi Arora , I come to conclusion that she is suffering from nonsensical verbal diohhrea and perhaps Supreme Court is not the best place to do it. She might contact some News channels which has many such patients and can fulfill her urge. Now let's come to the Facts. 1. You say the carbon dating of the artifacts belongs to around 7th century , Muslims invaded India much beyond that does it make a sense that the artifacts are of Muslims religion and of Mosque. 2. You Accept that the artifacts could be of Buddhism or Jainism and not of Hindu. Here you clearly accept that those are not the artifacts of Mosque or Muslims.  Lord Buddha is considered to be incarnation of Lord Vishnu. He was born in Lumbini in Nepal his father a king was Hindu than you argue budhha doesn't belong to Hinduism. Lord Ram did chaturmas during the last year of his exile, there is a conversation between Maharishi Narad and Lord Ram on this in Devibhagwat....

The material nature is working under my direction and it's producing all moving and non moving things by it's rule this manifestation is created and annihilated again and again. Bhagwat Geeta - chapter 9;10 It's I who am the ritual, I am the sacrifice, the offering to the ancestors,the healing herb, the transcendental chant. I am the butter the fire and the offering Bhagwat Geeta -chapter 9;16 The secret of all success and attainment act in manner conducive to the benefits of entire man kind as well as yourself. All your activities should be in service of God and to fulfill his design. This is the Secret of all success. -Vidur to dhritrashtra ( Mahabharata) The above words are more than enough to prove the reason behind objective of manifestation of belief behind worshiping Idols and Temples.  Lord Krishna himself says that it's he who manifest himself and he himself his the belief. If Hindus are performing the rituals they are worshiping his manifestation in...

Ram Janmabhoomi case is a matter of faith and it won't exist without belief, Faith is dependent on belief. An atheist has no faith because it perceive belief as tenuous. At one side Mr. Dhavan accept that every Guru Granth sahib installed in Gurudvara is a juristic Person than why can't you accept Idol of Ram as Juristic Person. It doesn't make sense of Lord Ram Temple description in Valmiki Ramayan. Because you can't built temple of a Lord before his incarnation. But description of city of Ayodhya is clearly mentioned in Valmiki Ramayan. Destruction of Temples and Idols and Babur's view on Idols is clearly mentioned in Baburnama. Do some fact check.

Proof of existence of Temple at the disputed sight as per ASI An Inscription was found at the site dated 23 october 1093 AD a day of eclipse, stating a garhwal king who are considered Rajput had gone to take bath in the River Saryu . Scientifically it can be prooved that on this day wether an eclipse occurred or it. Astrologically it did, it was a Solar eclipse day, It's a known tradition in hindu religion to take bath in river and donate as per ones will. Thus it clearly prooves existence of Temple at the site, What more do you need to proove the existence of Temple. Now Speaking of Baburnama written by Babur himself it is clearly mentioned there that he had fascination of destroying Hindu Idols. For more detail read the attachment.