ASI and Ramjanmbhoomi

Reading at yesterday's arguments of Meenakshi Arora , I come to conclusion that she is suffering from nonsensical verbal diohhrea and perhaps Supreme Court is not the best place to do it. She might contact some News channels which has many such patients and can fulfill her urge.
Now let's come to the Facts.

1. You say the carbon dating of the artifacts belongs to around 7th century , Muslims invaded India much beyond that does it make a sense that the artifacts are of Muslims religion and of Mosque.

2. You Accept that the artifacts could be of Buddhism or Jainism and not of Hindu. Here you clearly accept that those are not the artifacts of Mosque or Muslims.
 Lord Buddha is considered to be incarnation of Lord Vishnu. He was born in Lumbini in Nepal his father a king was Hindu than you argue budhha doesn't belong to Hinduism. Lord Ram did chaturmas during the last year of his exile, there is a conversation between Maharishi Narad and Lord Ram on this in Devibhagwat. Jainism also believe in chaturmas and they accept this belief yet you say Jainism is different from Hinduism.
To me this is utter nonsense I don't know from where did you got you law degree.

3. The shapes and sizes of the pillars are of the same sizes as found by ASI at dwarka city under water. There also circular structure has been found. The stones are of more or less of the same matter. Here I would like to mention that the pillars and temples will be built of the stones available in the near surrounding and markets, unless and until it's passionately motivated.
Since the structures found at  both the sites are of same size and shape do I need to say more about it in context of shape and size with regard to architecture of ancient India before Muslims Invaded India. Apply your common sense.

4.  Might be many of you don't know that Sits was first born out of Lotus , Ravan came to know of her birth and took her to Lanka their his counsels told him to leave her out as she would destroy Ravan. He threw Sita and after some time Janak plough the land out of which she was born and hence named Sita. King bhisbhan didn't had any children he performed yagya and Radha was born out of Lotus. Lakshmi sits on Lotus, and in the hands of Vishnu we see Lotus. Lotus has many significances in Hindu Religion History. One of the artifacts contains sign of Lotus and of Solar eclipse. Does Muslims belief in eclipse and performing of Rituals on solar eclipse. The artifacts clearly speaks of both the facts and carbon dating of that artifacts are of around 10th century.
Do I need to tell you more, use your common sense and if you don't have it do something to get it. You can meet me regarding getting common sense I will advise you spiritual method for it.

5. You have accepted that might be there was temple before it got destroyed and no one would have noticed it than after sometime Muslims would have come and built Mosque their. Alright as per your arguments you built your house it got perished. Your children didn't had enough money to rebuilt the house, few years later I came and built home their and hence I became the owner of the Land.
Congrats for your common sense!

Please it's a sincere request stop your nonsensical verbal diohhrea and finish your arguments soon as possible.